Current Article Ratings:
Patient / Public:
4 (1 votes)
Healthcare Prof:
When assessing the quantity of help someone needs, people’s perceptions might be skewed by their racial biases, in accordance with a Kansas State University study.
Donald Saucier, K-State associate professor of psychology, and psychology graduate students Sara Smith, Topeka, and Jessica McManus, Maineville, Ohio, surveyed undergraduate students a year following Hurricane Katrina to examine their perceptions of the hurricane victims and also the helping response.
The researchers produced a questionnaire that evaluated the participants’ perceptions of Hurricane Katrina victims. The questionnaire evaluated whom the participants perceived to be the victims based on measures like gender, race and socioeconomic status. The outcomes showed that participants typically thought people impacted by Hurricane Katrina had been black and lower class.
“What we wanted to do was see how perceptions of victims of Hurricane Katrina would interact with items like racism,” Saucier stated. “We wanted to look at just how much the participants felt that the victims could have been to blame for their own circumstance in Katrina.”
The researchers measured differences in the participants, such as their levels of conservatism, empathy and racism. The findings showed that when recalling victims of Hurricane Katrina, participants who were less racist thought the victims did not get adequate assist from the government. Participants who had been more racist thought the victims received adequate government assistance and had been at fault for their situation. The survey also asked concerns that measured regardless of whether the participants thought the victims had enough time to evacuate and no matter whether they had adequate resources to get out before the hurricane hit.
“We asked the participants to make personality attributions about people, such as whether they believed the victims had been lazy, stupid, sinful or unlucky,” Saucier said. “If they said they were lazy, stupid or sinful, they were putting more blame on the victims for the scenario. If they stated they were unlucky, they took away the blame.”
The outcomes recommend that perceptions with the victims and the Hurricane Katrina situation depended on the participants’ individual differences, including their levels of racism. Negative perceptions and placing blame on the victims had been generally linked using the participants’ perceptions that the circumstance was much less of an emergency and that the victims needed less aid.
Saucier stated despite the fact that the findings can’t fix what happened to the victims, the study assists show how folks interpret the situation. He stated when one thing negative occurs, individuals typically evaluate the circumstance and see no matter whether they can fix it, and occasionally they steer clear of the scenario by blaming the victim.
The researchers study the effects of group membership, and groups could be categorized in numerous techniques, which includes by gender, race and socioeconomic status. Studies show you’ll find specific elements that cause an individual to assist a member of their own group far more than other people. In helping circumstances, discrimination is usually expressed by not giving aid to those of a various group than the helper, Saucier stated.
“Rather than doing some thing poor, the person who chooses not to assist the out-group member fails to do one thing great,” Saucier said. “I feel this illustrates the complexity of how prejudice is expressed in contemporary society regardless of the social norms that generally serve to suppress the expression of prejudice.”
Saucier said discrimination is often expressed only when other aspects are present that would justify the action and rationalize it as some thing apart from an expression of prejudice. Variables that contribute to the justification of not helping someone include the time it would take to help; the risk, effort, difficulty and financial expense involved; the distance among the prospective helper and the individual needing support; the level of emergency as well as the ambiguity of the helping scenario.
The researchers stated the Hurricane Katrina scenario had several elements that studies show trigger acts of discrimination, including a high cost of help, a high level of emergency plus a big quantity of time and effort required to assist. The researchers are exploring other helping circumstances and how other group memberships have an effect on the helping response.
“We need to examine how the perception of somebody that you are going to be helping is going to have an effect on your perception of how much aid they require and how much aid you will desire to give,” Saucier stated.
Though it is unlikely that researchers can fix the beliefs and attitudes that result in discrimination, studies are being carried out to try to change the behavior which is expressed when related to discrimination, Saucier stated.
The researchers’ findings on Hurricane Katrina victims are included in a chapter about discrimination against out-group members in helping scenarios in “The Psychology of Prosocial Behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations and helping,” published in September 2009.
Source: Donald Saucier
Kansas State University